Realism proves overrated in lackluster ‘Dead’ reboot - WNCT

Realism proves overrated in lackluster ‘Dead’ reboot

Posted: Updated:

Horror films are one of the few places where realism isn't always a good thing, and the extraordinarily graphic violence in director Fede Alvarez's "Evil Dead" is a perfect example.

First, I want to make sure that I'm not complaining about any film titled "Evil Dead" being "too violent and gory." Of course it's gory, as I expected.

But while Sam Raimi's 1981 original "The Evil Dead" was graphically violent (as was his 1987 sequel "Evil Dead II"), the gore was so over-the-top it wasn't gross. It added a level of absurdity to films that were intended to be fun -- and it worked.

Alvarez supplies copious amounts of blood in his "Evil Dead," but time and effort were spent to make all the gruesome images (and acts of violence) look as realistic as possible. It was sickening, sure, but it wasn't scary and it wasn't fun. It was just gross.

The only upside to the amount of gruesome violence was that it caused my dear friend (and fellow "The Evil Dead" fan) Cara DaSilva and I to look turn away from the screen in disgust at the same times -- at which point we made funny faces at each other.

One thing I've learned over the years: if you're at the movies and you're more interested in thinking of different funny faces to make at your friend than whatever is happening on the screen, well, you're probably not watching a very good movie.

I think the biggest two issues I had with Alvarez's "Evil Dead" -- aside from the poster promoting it as the "most terrifying film you will ever experience" -- were the lack of fun and the lack of ownership.

By "lack of ownership," I mean that Alvadez (who also co-wrote the film) seems content to make a by-the-book remake of Raimi's 1981 masterpiece with a lot more money. The plot contains no interesting surprises and no interesting characters.

Five people go to the woods, the "smart guy" reads from a book he finds wrapped in barbed wire, and ultimately extremely realistic, gory violence ensues.

The characters are so generic that, little more than 48 hours after seeing the film, I can't remember any of their names. It doesn't help that they were all idiots who lacked whatever gene was necessary to think logically.

There's also the issue of how popular the "friends go to remote cabin" genre has become in the three decades since Raimi's "Dead."

In 1981, all the genre elements were (fairly) fresh. Audiences hadn't been subjected to countless clones, or smart films spoofing the genre like the hilarious "Tucker and Dale Vs. Evil" or the adventurous and surprising "The Cabin in the Woods." Alvarez and co-writer Rodo Sayagues are too content to stick with the genre norms and, in the process, they've created a film that was probably as boring on paper as it is on the screen.

I don't want to sound too negative, though. I wasn't bored, for one, and I've seen movies that are much worse than this one. But it's not very good and it doesn't come close to living up to the brand name, much like the 1999 "Star Wars" prequel "The Phantom Menace."

I think people would have enjoyed "Phantom" if it hadn't been a good film preceded by outstanding films. "Evil Dead" would probably look better if it wasn't a bland, new version of outstanding films.

When you're working with brand names that inspire excitement, there are going to be expectations. On this note, "Evil Dead" is a huge letdown instead of the "average letdown" if would be if it were just another dumb horror movie.

And it certainly isn't "the most terrifying film you will ever experience," no matter who you are. For me, that title still goes to either Frank Darabont's "The Mist" or Takashi Miike's "Audition."

"Evil Dead" is rated R for strong bloody violence and gore, some sexual content and language.

Powered by WorldNow

3221 South Evans Street
Greenville N.C. 27834

Telephone: 252.355.8500
Fax: 252.355.8568
Email: newsdesk@wnct.com

Can't find something?
Powered by WorldNow
All content © Copyright 2000 - 2014 Media General Communications Holdings, LLC. A Media General Company.